Search for: "Bui v. Holder et al" Results 1 - 20 of 76
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2007, 11:13 pm
Judge Batts didn’t buy the argument, and made several findings (some competely incorrect ), including: XM is operating as a traditional radio broadcaster, but by broadcasting and storing music, XM was both a broadcasting and distributing,  while only paying to broadcast (traditional radio pays no fees); and Comparing XM+MP3 players to a cassette recorders, she stated that it was “manifestly apparent that the use of a radio-cassette player to record songs played over free… [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Citing Monsanto Co. v Scruggs et Al., the court held that the purchaser of a patented technologies which can replicate itself is not authorised to use replicated copies of it, as this practice 'would eviscerate the rights of the patent holder'. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:49 am by Jim Singer
In Continental Automotive GmbH et al v. iBiquity Digital Corporation, the plaintiff held a license from the patent holder. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 8:11 pm by Stephen Bilkis
BOM, et al., Index Number 22937/2009, a residential foreclosure proceeding. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 1:29 pm by Thomas James
Thomas James (“The Cokato Copyright Attorney”) explains how Hachette Book Group et al. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 1:29 pm by Thomas James
Thomas James (“The Cokato Copyright Attorney”) explains how Hachette Book Group et al. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 6:53 am by Florian Mueller
Avanci et al. litigation in the Northern District of California, referred to their client as a "pool. [read post]